Her we have a sitting British MP openly calling for elimination of men. She sits on important commitees like ones that regulate internet content…I wonder why?

Here’s her quote:

Liberal Democrat executive committee member suspended over “kill all men” hate tweets

At HEqual we’re delighted to bring readers news of positive and very interesting developments concerning the Twitter hate speech of Liberal Democrat Executive Committe member Sarah Noble. Also known on Twitter as “sarahlicity”, Noble made a number of vile comments over several years, including wanting to “remove men from society” and advocating genocide of men by repeatedly tweeting “kill all men”. Noble also advocated for this removal of men from society at the infamous NUS Women 2015 conference. Outside of her Lib Dem work, Noble is a coordinator for Leeds University Union feminist society and also works on the hugely controversial Twitter blockbot.

https://hequal.wordpress.com/2015/04/16/liberal-democrat-executive-committee-member-suspended-over-kill-all-men-hate-tweets/

So when women say that when they (their feminist representatives) say they want to kill men to get us under “control” is just an exageration you can see the evidence that highly placed politicians truly feel this way.

Remember, this woman has not apoligized.

Is it any wonder that feminists want control of houses of government not by voting but by fiat, under threat of armed forces. What do you think Hillaries true mission in the white house will be. Consolidating female leadership world wide then with total control of reproduction to then reduce the male population.

Sounds mad right?

killing all men would truely screw “strong” women at a subconcious level they cannot control, weather they like it or not it will trigger some epigene that will make them into the very thing they hate the most, a submissive housewife.

The best part is, men “scarcity” is already happening WITHOUT the bloodshed. How? Mgtow. The more men go their own way, the fewer is the number of “providers” women have to chose from. In the end, only the most submissive and pathetic men will remain for the so called “strong and independent” woman of nowadays to pick. They will be left with 2 choices: ACTUALLY be strong and independent, or be EXTREMELY submissive and HOPE there are still tradcons around willing to take the burden of sustaining their asses.

I, personally, would choose the 1st rather than the latter. The last thing I want is some women-child to slow me down. I would like a partner, an equal, of something as close as possible, for me to share my life. OR I can keep doing my own thing.

Summing up: Check mate ladies. Check f~~~ing mate.

killing all men would truely screw “strong” women at a subconcious level they cannot control, weather they like it or not it will trigger some epigene that will make them into the very thing they hate the most, a submissive housewife.

So basically they don’t know what they want?

So basically they don’t know what’s good for them?

Nah, these women wanting to kill all men are clearly lesbians.

Killing all men will never happen, just look at 50 Shades of Rape. They ate that s~~~ up.. kill all men? Please, there’d be a female civil war.

The lesbians would lose because they don’t realize how vicious straight women will react.

Basically, lesbians want to burn the plantation by killing men. Straight women will destroy them, as they far, far, FAR outnumber them.

we have clear examples in history how “patriarchy”(not the bs feminist version) is formed. it happens after men are culled, there are so many women compared to men that women get treated like s~~~ and noone cares why?because in such a circumstance they are no longer the limiting factor in reproduction, so yes it would be a huge step back for women, as for straights stopping the lesbians, like i said i dont think most of these women are lesbians and even if they were staight women would not stop them until it is too late i.e. the male dominance patriarchy is formed, women would then have no choice but submit as slaves like in the past merely to survive, personally i wouldnt help em even if they beggedme, after such a scenario but most men would see having a harem of females to their advantage, when in reality the man is being milked like a f~~~ing cow.

Women like this believe they can inherit the world by making men extinct from it. The only reason it’s worth inheriting at all is that over a period of thousands of years, MEN have discovered, designed, built and operated the infrastructure of water, energy, agriculture, communication, transportation, engineering and medicine that make the planet inhabitable for them at all. Without those contributions, this planet is best suited to fish and reptiles and the average woman in it would not last a month.

In the absence of men to do the dirty work of maintaining it, most of that infrastructure would crumble in less than one (cloned) generation of female test tube babies…

Such is the nature of women: spend millennia expending blood and sweat to build a civilization that is safe for them… teach them to read and allow them to vote, and within a short hundred years they begin to call for your enslavement and extinction… while simultaneously complaining about where have all the good men gone?

After having read this idea, I feel like I was just walking down the street minding my own business when out of nowhere, I got crushed by an avalanche of stupid…

As I stated in a previous post, feminists want men at 10% of the population. They openly state that they want only enough men to fix the machines, lift heavy objects, fight wars, etc.

Feminists are idiots.  They simply do not comprehend the simple concept of supply and demand.

If men are only 10% of the population they will have better things to do than fix machines, lift heavy objects, fight wars, etc.  Women have only been able to get away with gynocentrism because sperm is plentiful and cheap while ovum are limited and expensive.  They’re hosed whenever sperm becomes rare.

Edit: Looks like @a banana and @BadKan saw this before I got here.  Now if @a banana and @BadKan and I and a million other men can see the obvious result of male culling, why can’t feminists?

Remember, this women has been already voted in by the general population, feminist majority. She is no low level “clerk” found sending a scarce email. She’s been saying this for years and is in positions of great power.

With one stroke of her pen, Hitlary can cut all mens salaries by 33% to get the necessary 100% job pay equality with women.

Don’t think it’s possible? Did you ever think that college would set up Kangaroo Courts to try our young men for casual sex hookups with willing co-eds?

Did you ever think it was possible that the head of reddit would make salary negotiation illegal in her company because some bogus reports say women are worse negotiators?

Think it’s bad now? They are the majority and want us dead. How far do you think they would go in hurting us. You ain’t seen nothing yet.

MGTOW is the only way to stay as self sufficient as possible and don’t depend on or feed the feminist machine.