However, the way I see feminism being spun by feminists is that it means “equality for all”.  Since when is an -ism, besides egalitarianism, NOT about the superiority of something over something else?  Capitalism is all about the superiority of Capital that is privately owned, and Communism is property owned by the state.  Other systems claim superiority, OR at least speak of the group it is supporting trying to get it more power.

Does any other -ism, besides egalitarianism, speak about “equality for all”?  But Feminism claims this?  I know one can go into a rant about how Feminism is bull, but I just wanted to look at this more objectively.

In fact the dream for equality is as old as mankind. It’s the most populistic term, all major empires and civilizations were promising that to their peoples and all have perished.

And religions, they basically use this same method to govern the masses. “We are all equal in the eyes of God”… but only if we accept this one God they told us to and follow his instructions.

Nothing new under the Sun…

This video gets into it (just explains it):

So it is “equality for all” under the banner of the ism.

Communism was never about equality for all. It’s about a permanent elitism of the Communist Party, and even central banks are called for in the communist manifesto. Communism is actually capitalism, with power and money controlled by the oligarchs, or party members. Russian really hasn’t changed much.

Idealists will pitch some sort of utopia and then live high on the hog until the said “utopia” arrives.  It is what they always do, when their natural impulses undermine everything.  The novel Animal Farm goes right into it.  Start out with calls of liberation and then exploitative alphas game the system in their favor, and you end up with doublespeak, with some animals more equal than others.