Door#1: Woman and “Man” (making the man mud at this point to be molded by the woman)

Door#2: Man and Man, (I can’t believe I writing this stuff) New Man/Man Divorce courts and subsequent divorce lawyers.

Door#3: Woman and Woman (again, I can’t believe I writing this stuff) New Woman/Woman Divorce courts and subsequent divorce lawyers.

Here’s where it gets tricky, now that we have a Governmental triple decker industrial oven for marriage; what happens when it’s a group wedding where multiple partners of different sexes want to form a corporation, uniting them in one large happy family of an orgy nature? Who goes where? will they expand the oven to include endless dinominations? or do they consolidate and invest in napalm to replace the oven, so as to streamline the government (of course).

What are your opinions on gay marriage, and the “implications” (as you see it) that it places on the legal system and society in general? Not that you give a damn, I know I sure don’t, these days I conciser any form of governmental matrimony as a toxic venture to explore the depths of misery…

Here is the only place one can ask such perplexing question and get an array of answers greater than a rainbow……Your comments are very much appreciated…

I’m already supporting her and cohabitating with her.  It would just be a sexless marriage like a lot of human to human marriages end up anyhow.  Actually it would be an open marriage…she’d have to get it from a dog have some puppies for me to claim as dependents, so if I had a mistress on the side it would be ok.

I started off typing that as a joke…but about 30 seconds into it I realized marrying a dog actually seems like a better decision than marrying a woman.

I truly don’t give a molecule of a s~~~ about the ramifications of expanded marriage to society or the judiciary.  Both of those can collapse and I would not care, as they both deserve to. I do give a s~~~ about SCOTUS rulings in the past couple days that pervert and abuse the illusion of supreme court legitimacy by vastly and unconstitutionally expanding the role of the courts (and also bureaucrats) to rewrite legislation on a whim, or to bequeath “rights” on high by alluding to a founding document that does not give them or the federal govt the authority to do so.

Scalia said it perfectly in this zinger … “Words no longer have meaning if an Exchange that is not established by a State is ‘established by the State.’”  If that doesn’t scare the f~~~ out of people I don’t know what will. It literally means that judges can interpret things to mean the verbatim opposite of what they say, and soon this will extend to contracts, agreements, you name it, because if that can be done with the actual, unambiguous word of law then nothing is safe. And these assholes have the unlimited power of violence to enforce their whimsical decrees or desires.

It is not acceptable to allow gay marriages, I am totally against it because marriages involves god and the bible doesn’t not agree with gay marriages. I don’t hate gays it is just that gay culture will destroy society. All this feminism and gay culture will be least of my worries. The thing that concerns me more is the elite enslaving us with more taxes.

This is what you get from the reprobate minds created in the feminist altered institutions of higher learning (ivy league)

I live in the aftermath of a reprobate court decision, Trust me, I know!

It’s all over for any semblance of good public order. The real chaos is about to begin… These asshole liberal reprobate judges are mostly to blame for all the misery that plagues and endangers this nation, “once upon a time” is going to apply to EVERYTHING! Eventually MGTOW will be the only human beings left alive. Seems like Armageddon is becoming more and more a reality on the horizon, not some storybook fantasy as it’s mocked and ridiculed by the same people to bring it on.

I’m getting some more popcorn, This is one HELL of a show!

The divorce lawyers will be mostly against it. It’s time for all dog owners to rise right now.