MGTOWThe Myth of Matriarchal Prehistory: Why an Invented Past Won't Give Women a Futu – MGTOW

The Myth of Matriarchal Prehistory: Why an Invented Past Won't Give Women a Futu

Sat, 27 Jun 2015 12:16:31 +0000

The Myth of Matriarchal Prehistory: Why an Invented Past Won’t Give Women a Future. This book is written by a woman named Cynthia Eller, but she could be a proxy due to the implications of it. Anyway, I’m just starting it. I think it is important to understand and read between the lines of the lies that the progressives, marxists, feminists, and racists told the Native American peoples about their own history after losing so much of their culture and their men due to the wars and westward expansion. We all, as men, should be helping our brothers in strife and poverty helping them get into touch with all of our common roots as men and people, no matter how hard it is to bridge the communication gap. It is terrible what is happening on reservations, people are afraid to address it, and the progressives that are and have been are only making it worse, and by accident now as this brain washing ultra elitist funded marxo feminism of our day is at a self perpetuating continuity. The lies that spread and gender conflict agitation that was engineered by actual Social Darwinist elites that first begun in black slums and reservations needs to be told. Margaret Sanger and the whole laundry lists of programs that were used against blacks first as testing grounds for all people and races, is currently being exposed. However, all peoples that these atrocities were committed against needs to come to light. There are rumors that Russel Means was a social engineer from Chicago that came down to the rez to stir up conflict – possibly for attention or a part of a bigger plot and hired by the same fools that want genocide, unrest, etc. That’s how many progressives and feminists out there have written the words Matriarchy next to Native American in so many articles, or words like “all indigenous peoples all over the world were matriarchal”. So, white people aren’t indigenous to anywhere I guess? Or they say things like Jews were the first and only patriarchal society and it just spread from there. These lies have to stop before the real histories of all peoples are suppressed, changed and forgotten.

Some of these same matriarchal propagators (aside from their elitist founders and backers) theorize that all peoples stem from two different types of monkeys (not arguing for or against evolution here – stay on topic – don’t divert the argument) Chimps and Bonobos. Chimps are the warring monkey, where as bonobos are the more peaceful, loving and passive ones. However, despite the clear foundation for eugenics being laid down, academically, I espouse that the only two species/races are men and women. (satirically)

And its important to understand our world history before it is diluted even further and rewritten or suppressed to fit the progressive’s agendas.

Anyways, peace brothers.

Reply To: The Myth of Matriarchal Prehistory: Why an Invented Past Won't Give Women a Futu

RoyDal — Sat, 27 Jun 2015 16:07:12 +0000

There has not been one matriarchal society successful enough to defend its territory and possessions against bandits or invaders. I have not heard of any matriarchies that were not the stuff of legend. For example, if the Amazons existed, it was at a time when gods walked the earth and interfered in the affairs of men. Moreover, the Amazons were nowhere to be found by the time of the Trojan war.

Edit:

@Utopian Lobotomy,
Maybe your book will come up with more and better examples than a Bronze Age myth. If so, I hope you will share it. I’m always interested in these things.

Society asks MGTOWs: Why are you not making more tax-slaves?

Reply To: The Myth of Matriarchal Prehistory: Why an Invented Past Won't Give Women a Futu

Mon, 29 Jun 2015 21:00:09 +0000

Finding viking women buried with swords is addressed. How there is no battle scars on the bones, etc and how the swords would be unwieldy for a female combined with the armor and how no records of women vikings in battle exist, these are their husbands or son’s swords. Today’s culture is so ready to rewrite history by jumping on archaeological finds like this and throw their two cents in trendy pop sci and cosmo type mags it makes archaeology and the study of history nearly obsolete, the truth can’t be heard and is ignored. Secondly, I’m surprised more mgtows didn’t respond?
How far does this brainwashing cut across into groups of men? And why the hell don’t more men speak out to other females their females – it could bring some light into groups of other circles of females – letting them see their bulls~~~ as their friends spread smear campaigns on the father’s of their children to indoctrinate and take full possession of his children?

Reply To: The Myth of Matriarchal Prehistory: Why an Invented Past Won't Give Women a Futu

Helen be Damned — Thu, 02 Jul 2015 14:01:18 +0000

Funny, they did the same thing about the dinosaurs where they assembled the bones they found in an order they thought was right, only to discover later that some of them didn’t go where they thought and sometimes not even with the same species. The logical fallacy of proceeding under the assumption that you are correct and know what you are doing.

"You can keep your soul, I don't want a cell-mate." - Them Crooked Vultures