You’re in an argument. She says something that is full of holes, ie, deceit and untruthfulness. Now you start picking those holes one by one. But suddenly, she derives something from the previous sentence or says a completely new sentence that is also full of holes. And another one! So now you have over a dozen different holes to work with. You start forgetting the holes, and manipulation starts working it’s magic. Sentence upon sentence creates an falseness that could only be described as a monstrosity.

Remember, your instinct is your friend. The very moment you sense that she’s trolling you, you need to tune out. Women are fascinating. How do they know how to do this? It boggles my mind!

The best way to win is not to argue with them. Barring that, my modus operandi is as follows:
1) sum the arguments and facts up in one sentence, two at most
2) after they formulate a counter-argument, repeat the sentence
3) repeat 2 until they are worn down

Females and logic do not mix. Their tactics are to confuse, shift goalposts, and shame. The best way to win is not to argue with them. Barring that, my modus operandi is as follows: 1) sum the arguments and facts up in one sentence, two at most 2) after they formulate a counter-argument, repeat the sentence 3) repeat 2 until they are worn down

I disagree. They understand logic (although they may be inferior in terms of logical deduction) and they also know what they’re doing. Whatever their end goal may be…. to confuse, shame or shift goalposts….. it doesn’t matter because your instinct is telling you that it’s untrue and full of holes. And you’re right, there’s no point in reasoning with her at that time. I don’t think there’s any point in repeating the sentence because she already knows what you’re saying the first time. I’d just leave.

You’re in an argument. She says something that is full of holes, ie, deceit and untruthfulness. Now you start picking those holes one by one. But suddenly, she derives something from the previous sentence or says a completely new sentence that is also full of holes. And another one! So now you have over a dozen different holes to work with.

Ha haaaa well RedPillDETOX, one can only presume that she probably in this case expects you to ever so skillfully pick out each and every “hole” she has just planted, one by one, and turn each and every one of them “holes” straight into pearls and string ’em up onto a collier or necklace to gently hang it around her neck with your own wits and a genuine lovely smile on your face and most importantly all of that without her even noticing it happening, which of course is virtually impossible to accomplish, since she already was expecting just that to be done for her in the first place, right..?

In short: “A man can never please any woman enough…”     hence —> any manipulation from her end is just another kind of sodding typical though irrelevant bs.

Remember, your instinct is your friend. The very moment you sense that she’s trolling you, you need to tune out. Women are fascinating. How do they know how to do this? It boggles my mind!

They don’t “know how to do this”. That’s giving them too much credit. It’s not intentional, they’re literally that scattered.

If one is arguing with someone alone, I would normally walk away and maybe flip the bird, but if others are present, that would result in losing face. Sticking to an argument and not addressing the opponent’s nonsense is the best way to avoid that.

RedPillDETOX wrote:

I disagree. They understand logic (although they may be inferior in terms of logical deduction) and they also know what they’re doing. Whatever their end goal may be…. to confuse, shame or shift goalposts….. it doesn’t matter because your instinct is telling you that it’s untrue and full of holes. And you’re right, there’s no point in reasoning with her at that time. I don’t think there’s any point in repeating the sentence because she already knows what you’re saying the first time. I’d just leave.

I disagree. They understand logic (although they may be inferior in terms of logical deduction) and they also know what they’re doing.

I have to disagree. Again, it’s generally not intentional to simply manipulate. They do not know the difference between what they “want” and reality (logic). They think that what they “want” is real (to them) and will go to any lengths to justify it.

They don’t “know how to do this”. That’s giving them too much credit. It’s not intentional, they’re literally that scattered.

haha, that could be true, but I’m pretty damn sure they know what they’re doing. At least, for the most part.

Ned Trent wrote:

Ha haaaa well RedPillDETOX, one can only presume that she probably in this case expects you to ever so skillfully pick out each and every “hole” she has just planted, one by one, and turn each and every one of them “holes” straight into pearls and string ‘em up onto a collier or necklace to gently hang it around her neck with your own wits and a genuine lovely smile on your face and most importantly all of that without her even noticing it happening, which of course is virtually impossible to accomplish, since she already was expecting just that to be done for her in the first place, right..? In short: “A man can never please any woman enough…” hence —> any manipulation from her end is just another kind of sodding typical though irrelevant bs.

I didn’t get the joke. But I’m pretty sure it’s like a s~~~ test. They want you to trust your instincts like an alpha and ignore it.

Attempting to alter reality and reinvent history

Pathological Lying

A warped and delusional hold on facts (often morphing into fantasy combined with the above listed pathological lying)

Use of a vagina to negotiate and set terms and conditions that no man with a reasonable understanding of how to masturbate would settle for.

Just because they understand logic does not mean that they use logic, at least when it is not advantageous to them in the course of an informal debate. If one is arguing with someone alone, I would normally walk away and maybe flip the bird, but if others are present, that would result in losing face. Sticking to an argument and not addressing the opponent’s nonsense is the best way to avoid that.

Yeah, that’s true. Though, she’s already lost face by spewing bulls~~~. If others can’t see it, f~~~ them!