The end of official slavery meant a more complicated race neutral sounding “ideology” needed to be employed to subordinate, degrade, and ultimately intimidate and exploit the labor of men at the bottom of society.

The more efficient the capitalist exploitation of men producing all the necessities of life, the more surplus capital there was to create sedentary fluff jobs for women which were either managerial or otherwise non-productive and, instead, involved in all the scheming necessary to maintain the cheap labor force at the bottom.

This is one of the best explanation of what feminism is really about that I have ever read.

Here is our great MGTOW writer, Damion Schloming, a great thinker:

And here’s Olivia Wilde to boycott.

If someone needs to tell people feminism is about equality clearly it isn’t or she wouldn’t have had to make the statement in the first place. it would have been self evident.

If someone needs to tell people feminism is about equality clearly it isn’t or she wouldn’t have had to make the statement in the first place. it would have been self evident.

Yeah, especially when it comes to their explanation of the patriarchy. I mean, don’t you think they’d be helping a guy like me out at the bottom of the economic ladder if they existed? I’m starting to think it’s a tool to make women feel like they actually contribute. How much ego does it take to say, “Well, the patriarchy has to make concessions like affirmative action because we applied enough pressure!”