- AuthorSearch Results
- 2016-07-07 at 2:06 PM#263351
Totally. I’m just willing to suffer the consequences of standing up for the truth and what is right.
Taking bribes from the worst human rights abusers on earth is wrong.
I’m also amazed that her hoi palloi followers are so blinded that they refuse to accept that only a terrible person would take money from countries like Saudi Arabia that execute people for being gay, and then claim to be an advocate for LGBT people.
Donald Trump may have said some things that *might* be construed as racist (I thought Mexico was a country, not a race BTW), but that’s not even in the same league as actually taking money from some of the worst pieces of s~~~ on the planet.
I’m just looking for some solid evidence to back it up.
"Data, I would be delighted to offer any advice I can on understanding women. When I have some, I'll let you know." --Captain Picard,
2016-07-07 at 2:17 AM#263178Convenience cancels whatever morals/values there are in this world.
Expediency trumps morals and ethics? You can’t possibly mean that.
No trumphing…no trumphing. I believe in a fine balance. For every man who doesn’t give a s~~~ about this world, there’s always another who’d sacrifice his life for it.
A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush.
2016-07-07 at 1:32 AM#263154Convenience cancels whatever morals/values there are in this world.
Expediency trumps morals and ethics? You can’t possibly mean that.
2016-07-06 at 10:40 PM#263090
AnonymousI have no problem with abortion. Sure women should take responsibility but that doesnt happen. Abortion means fewer crime rates, less people, and more resources.
Side car mentioned some good points but only if the system were to change as a whole.
Trump 2016
2016-07-06 at 10:31 PM#263089I personally don’t agree with abortion and the racist, psycho bitch who create planned parenthood deserves to rot in hell.
Population control is a sick business but it’s the only trump card that Machiavellian inc has right now.2016-07-06 at 1:39 PM#262833
AnonymousI don’t know. Every damn woman I personally know hates her guts with a seething passion. Even my liberal Aunt in California hates her, due to the way Sanders was manhandled. I could tell that my Aunt is either going to just not vote or may actually be ripe for me to sell her on Trump.
Hitlery is “The Establishment” candidate now and both sides of the fence are not in the mood for any more of this oligarch s~~~ sandwich we’ve been chomping on the past 30 odd years.
I’m just glad I live w/in the guaranteed instant vaporization zone of this bitch if that psychotic c~~~ wins:
2016-07-06 at 1:34 PM#262828Only in recent history with women getting the vote have we gone nuts about the minor thing. Don’t get me wrong, I’m specifically speaking of ages around 14-18 and no younger you damn pervs. There are reasons why “sweet sixteen” and “Quincieneras” (15 yo b-day parties) were held. Because families agreed that the girl was mature enough for marriage/aka monogomous sex. Not village whore sex.
I think 14 is a little low and anything below that is bordering on pedo and icky. 15/16 is a fine minimum.
The government has decreed which age you’re allowed to shag and with who you want. Immoral? Probably. Illegal? No.
If you want to shag a hag at that point, then that’s your decision.
Like you said older women are trying to block out the younger competition, instead of just accepting that they’ve been replaced by newer models and that time has passed them by.
Don’t look at me, I didn’t make boys or girls biologically geared to have sex and children at that age. You need to keep in mind, the body is programmed by DNA, and our social norms can either acknowledge it or through particular social reasoning work around it or avoid it. While some women may seem to childish at 14, there are others that can be mistaken for 18 because either growth hormones or individual genetic make up. We have all seen variations of development during the teenage years.
I posted a video not to long ago about some asshole attacking a dude’s 16 year old son with a Trump hat thinking he was older because him and his dad likely bodybuilders.
2016-07-06 at 1:26 PM#262816In reply to: Pussy Pass Wins Again

AnonymousLong term I think this is going to play very well for Trump. It’s so egregious that it’s like container ship loads of ammo for Trump’s Ma’ Deuce attack style.
The oligarchs need to hijack the Republican nomination from him to assure control which would be like throwing a lit match into a gasoline spill.
2016-07-05 at 6:55 PM#262415In reply to: Surprise!!!!
I recently had an argument with my sister about this. She said, “There have been some good female leaders over the years.”
Perhaps. There have also been some good male leaders over the years. That doesn’t necessarily mean that Trump will be. Same goes for his opponent.
The performance of previous leaders is no inducement of what the next one’s going to offer. Maybe the world has produced some good female leaders, but it has also produced some very bad ones, so you can’t assume from a few small mercies that the next runner is going to be a godsend. I don’t know why it’s so hard to put that together.
How much did England really change for the better when Thatcher was in power? Unemployment in Britain soared to about 80% during her time in office, and that ended up being the country’s most notable benchmark from that period. I notice that The Iron Lady conveniently left that out. Any questions?
To see what is in front of one's nose requires a constant struggle. -Orwell
2016-07-05 at 6:18 PM#262394In reply to: Pussy Pass Wins Again
As I like to say “I’m not voting for Donald Trump. I’m voting for ‘Not Hillary Clinton'”
“Civilized men are more discourteous than savages because they know they can be impolite without having their skulls split, as a general thing.” - Robert E. Howard
2016-07-05 at 12:14 PM#262228In reply to: Surprise!!!!
This thing was scripted from the start. If any average joe had exposed classified information on a private server, they would have gotten a very unpleasant visit from the special weapons and tactics team, and likely given a MINIMUM of 5 years in prison, and after it ended up in the hands of Russian and Chinese intel, likely a minimum of 10 years.
Can you imagine if sanders or even trump did the exact same thing ? There would be no “meeting” they would hit him with every charge under the sun.
If we listen to a female at all, It's no longer to find out if they're crazy, we know they're crazy, It's to find out what flavor.
2016-07-04 at 11:32 AM#261803In reply to: Post Orlando Effect on LGBT Self Defense Views
Hmmm. .
Future Trump supporters? ..It seems that way. When will people realize that kind words and all the PC rhetoric won’t change s~~~? We’ve tried and failed, can we try something else? Opening your arms and hugging them to death won’t work, it hasn’t worked. So why the f~~~ would you keep trying it? Don’t want to offend the people that just gunned down a bunch of innocent people at a club. Might be a little too late for that.
Feminism is a movement where opinions are presented as facts and emotions are presented as evidence.
2016-07-04 at 11:18 AM#261796In reply to: Post Orlando Effect on LGBT Self Defense Views
Hmmm. .
Future Trump supporters? ..2016-07-03 at 6:17 PM#261612In reply to: *Possible* leak by anon
No s~~~poster could do this as well as he did. I’m thinking that this is legit.
I missed him also. Damn. I could have asked if Obama, Biden and Sanders were in on all of this too.
This was just announced today:
How is this going to work out if the President, who appoints the FBI Director and oversees him along with the entire FBI, going to interview Clinton, whom he, Biden and Sanders, and knows is being investigated by the FBI? Why not answer questions from the public? Or Trump, her political opponent?
This is shady as f~~~.
2016-07-02 at 3:55 AM#261107In reply to: What Hilary Clinton Is Really Like
I am not sure if you guys talked to people who support Hillary. I have never spoken to people in a such denial. The excuse is always pointing to something about Trump or saying that those aren’t valid sources because it didn’t come from CNN, NYTimes, etc. They only trust what mainstream media offers, even though they are all funded by companies that donated to Hillary, like Time Warner Cable. It’s scary. It explains that no matter what comes out, her polls remain the same. Those are the diehard denial people.
2016-07-01 at 4:49 PM#260977In reply to: FNG – Bored of Brazilian chicks.
Cheers Mr Trump! Good to be here!
"Marriage is a good way to meet someone you hate and then buy them a house'
2016-07-01 at 3:46 PM#260954In reply to: my late intro. ;)

A man without a woman is like a fish without a hook.
2016-07-01 at 1:05 PM#260888In reply to: my late intro. ;)
Are you the real Donald Trump?
I'm married to the game,but she broke her vows.
2016-06-30 at 9:03 PM#260667In reply to: my late intro. ;)

Anonymousgreat to hear .
i drove cross country a couple months ago,
homemade Trump signs were everywhere.
the people of this nation want him to be president.Hopefully he gets in, not my first choice but i’ll take him.
2016-06-30 at 8:16 PM#260649In reply to: my late intro. ;)
great to hear .
i drove cross country a couple months ago,
homemade Trump signs were everywhere.
the people of this nation want him to be president. - AuthorSearch Results

925069
924988
922113
921526
921524
919244
916783
915526
915524
915354
915129
914037
909862
908811
908810
908500
908465
908464
908300
907963
907895
907477
902002
901301
901106
901105
901104
901024
901017
900393
900392
900391
900390
899038
898980
896844
896798
896797
895983
895850
895848
893740
893036
891671
891670
891336
891017
890865
889894
889741
889058
888157
887960
887768
886321
886306
885519
884948
883951
881340
881339
880491
878671
878351
877678
