Search Results for 'Trump'

You know Donald Trump is winning when Scaplers treat Trump like a Rock Star!

When is the last time you heard of scapling tickets for a political rally? In advance? Well, that is what happening folks, at Fort Myers, Florida, for a Donald Trump political rally event coming Monday afternoon, September 19, 2016. With Scaplers selling tickets for $200 a pop, days in advance.

Though, it is becoming clear the location the Trump Campaign picked out will not be large enough. That the 8000 seating will not fit the 15,000 people expected to come and they are looking for a large venue.

Scalpers Sell Tickets for $200 a Pop to Trump’s Sold Out Florida Rally

Still, this scapling show the excitement and enthusiasm the American people have for Donald Trump. While the Hillary campaign has problems filling up a high school gymnasium.

The only things the Hillary campaign has is the press and the 1%. Everyone else is heading towards Donald Trump.

“Les Deplorables!”

[Nathan R. JessepParticipant]

Tuneout wrote:

Joey Alfio wrote:

This is a clash between true libertarians and globalists. If Trump loses then who do we have left? Who will continue to defy the global agenda of a no border welfare state? And in chir’s response to his mentioning of TPP… it won’t just affect the economy but the internet is also at stake.

TPP has no expiration date!

There is always ways around internet censorship

however you can’t really get around trade agreements.

Canada will also be a big loser if this is signed,

at least with Trump projects like the Keystone XL

pipeline would be approved.

Keystone XL will increase the cost of oil in the U.S. Right now we get a discount because Canada has no other way to sell it. Once they are able to pipe it down to New Orleans they can sell it at market price. This is all in their application.

[Nathan R. JessepParticipant]

The_Mad_Pirate wrote:

My opinion is that Trump is promoting two of my all time favorites values : individualism and secularism. He wants every individual citizen to be the best person they can, that’s why getting back jobs lost due to outsourcing so every working class person has an oportunity to grow. I believe that’s why that is such a strong talking point in his campaign.
Second point is to keep goverment separated from religion. No religion should get a free pass in the west from goverment if their core values are incompatible with western values.

Trump is saying what people want to hear so he can get elected and make laws that benefit his pocketbook. He doesn’t give a f~~~ about the average American and will do nothing for them once elected. The wealthy are going to see some sweet tax cuts though.

[Nathan R. JessepParticipant]

Joey Alfio wrote:

This is a clash between true libertarians and globalists. If Trump loses then who do we have left? Who will continue to defy the global agenda of a no border welfare state? And in chir’s response to his mentioning of TPP… it won’t just affect the economy but the internet is also at stake.

TPP has no expiration date!

Why is controlling the border such an issue now for Republicans when Reagan and both Bush’s did nothing to stop illegal immigration. Hell, Reagan gave illegals amnesty.

[Nathan R. JessepParticipant]

Honorable_Juice_Box wrote:

Uintatherium wrote:

“Trump’s anti-globalization will create an economic meltdown!”

That’s what they said about Brexit yet the country has yet to self-immolate since leaving the EU.

Funny how they call Trump a fear-monger yet that is EXACTLY what they do. The projection is real gents.

Brexit was a non-binding vote and they have not invoked Article 50 to actually leave the EU. The PM has stated it won’t happen this year and refuses to stay when it will happen. Could be never.

Take a look at the dollar-pound chart and tell me there wasn’t a meltdown that the UK is still paying for.

[HitmanParticipant]

i’m a busy guy and not as politically savy as some of you ..
Trump is the best choice for many reasons..
cruz doesn’t have a chance to beat him..

[Chaff/FlareParticipant]

Anonymous wrote:

Chaff/Flare wrote:

Sorry dude. Watched these animals throw little girls in front of our trucks. Stop, get an RPG in the face. Go, a speed bump is never the same again.

Who’s country were you in?

Not the point, although I understand what you are trying to say.

Put it this way JB, we hate when women throw the kids in front of our trucks during divorce. And that’s in any western country.

When you find yourself in the majority, it's time to reflect.

Hillary Campaign accused of wrongly charging donors multiple times.

It seems that the Hillary Campaign has been accused of using credit card information by small time donors to repeating charge for more donations, when these donations were suppose to be a one time donations.

This is thefts are of less than a hundred dollars per charge. But, it is still stealing and from people whom likely do not have the money to afford such theft.

You can read about accusation here: http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-09-16/allegations-fraud-surface-over-one-time-donations-hillary-occur-repeatedly

Unlike Wikileaks, this theft is being done in real time. And unlike her health, this is being willingly done. If this is true. These thefts are inexcusable. This scandal could be the final nail in the coffin for the Hillary campaign.

Though, the question is why?

It is reported that Hillary is pulling down tens of millions of dollars at each of her large dinner parties with the super rich.

These small thefts by donors is pocket change compared to that. Why? There are only two reason for this. Neither are good for the Hillary campaign.

Either someone is getting their jollies from stealing from the poor.

Or, the Hillary campaign is burning through so much money, and so fast, they are almost broke.

It is possible the Hillary campaign is almost broke. The giant airplane she bought, the customized vehicles, the medical equipment, the around the clock staff, cost money. And while tax money is used for some of these expenses. A lot of it is from her own campaign. If one starts making a list it gets real expensive very quickly.

If this is proven true, when the Trump campaign pick up on this. And they likely will. They will tear into this scandal. This scandal is the embodiment of stealing from the poor. And by exposing this scandal, this will also driving a wedge between the poor and the Hillary campaign. The Hillary campaign needs to the poor for their votes.

While Wikileaks is good. This type of scandal is politically tangible with American people that have been harm within the last few days to weeks. Instead of those harmed years ago.

[Honorable_Juice_BoxParticipant]

Uintatherium wrote:

“Trump’s anti-globalization will create an economic meltdown!”

That’s what they said about Brexit yet the country has yet to self-immolate since leaving the EU.

Funny how they call Trump a fear-monger yet that is EXACTLY what they do. The projection is real gents.

[TuneoutParticipant]

Religion was invented to keep ALL people in place,

and I like Trump because he calls a Bimbo a Bimbo!

Lifes a bitch,but you don't have to marry one!

[IGMOW (I Go My Own Way)Participant]

The moment health gets pushed as an issue, and this obsessing, you open up a can of worms and Trump’s weight will come into this. Trump is borderline obese and is riding on his genetics to do anything. He doesn’t eat well, and doesn’t work out. He still hasn’t done a full disclosure either.

I doubt he could even walk up the tower Teddy Roosevelt set up that he said Americans need to traverse or America was doomed. It is hard pressed to think anyone could. Ok, probably GW Bush could. But among the current patch of candidates?

"I am my own thang. Any questions?" - Davis S Pumpkins.

Hi guys. Let’s talk about the NeverTrump movement.

I will admit that some NeverTrumpers are good people who want to vote for Gary Johnson. Of course, most NeverTrumpers are scum who support Ted Cruz. Today, I will be talking about the stupidest s~~~ that they say.

“America has abandoned Jesus. Trump is not a real Christian.”

I’ll be frank. I’m not a religious man. I see Christianity as a potential means to an end rather than an end. As far as I’m concerned, Christianity exists to keep women in their place. If Christianity has failed at this task then I don’t care about Christianity anymore. Trump is the most anti-feminist candidate.

“Trump hates Mexicans!”

Why do you say that? The other Republicans are anti-immigrant too.

“He’s Islamophobic!”

The rest of the Republican party is too. Cruz supporters have no right to call Trump an Islamophobe.”

“He supports socialized medicine!”

Wow. I really don’t give a s~~~.

“Trump’s anti-globalization will create an economic meltdown!”

Perhaps it will in the short term. In the long term, he will make America great again.

“He’s rude.”

I don’t care.

“He said that the TPP was raping america! He’s trivializing rape!”

Well … the other Republicans trivialize torture and murder with words like “enhanced interrogation” and “collateral damage”.

“He said that he would bomb the s~~~ out of ISIS and kill their families!”

At least he didn’t call it “collateral damage”.

“He’s too friendly with Putin.”

That’s because Putin has nukes. Putin is a scary guy but p~~~ing him off (like what Hillary wants to do) is not a good idea.

“He supports torture.”

As opposed to “enhanced interrogation”?

Anyways, Trump will be a good president because he might end the Western Empire once and for all. Sometimes he opposes neoconservatism. At other times, he promotes imperialism using the worst arguments ever. Either way, he is tearing apart the empire. This will restore the republic.

The Cruz supporters are scum. Behind their Christian exterior lies bloodlust. #NeverTrump? More like #NeverEndingWar! Most NeverTrumpers are just mad because the empire is in jeopardy. That explains why so many of them are voting for Hillary.

Make The World Great Again

MGTOW: because you can (and should) say anything about a woman as long as she isn't within earshot

[eqlifeSpectator]

Anonymous wrote:

eqlife wrote:

Bad boy, nice guy…doesn’t matter. I’ve played both roles. Neither worked. Why? Because I am poor. Money trumps all, hence the rise in young females looking for a “daddy” (look up ddlg/daddy on tumblr. Literally thousands of women BEGGING for money, selling their dirty panties or downright asking for some cuck to send them a money order. A lot of them are UNDERAGE. Trained from birth to be leeches). The fact is most women are grown children looking to be taken care of. Alpha/beta is a facade. We are all potential beta providers in their eyes. I noticed this trend grow exponentially after 50 Shades of Grey blew up. That book is actually interesting, not the book itself, but the way it put female nature on blast (by their own doing). They want to be dominated, only as long as they are taken care of and absolved of all responsibility

A lot of this is right, but not really the first part.

I was broke into my early-30s. I worked white collar and was unconnected, and it took a long time to make connections, get rid of debt, and build stability. My story is not uncommon.

But women were absolutely all over me most of that time. When it’s just sex, no relationship or anything else, they prefer attractive men. Yes it doesn’t matter good guy or bad guy, except to the fact that “Chad” is code for a type of effeminate bad guy.

Most men aren’t attractive. And if you’re not attractive, you have to play the Chad role or get money. That’s true.

If anything, I did sort of hit a “wall” in my late/20s early/30s when it was then money that began to matter more. Although younger women even then didn’t care so much, and as my sex drive began to collapse it was harder and harder for me to care. I began to really start getting in the positive around then but it could have been the last of my youthful looks as well before they faded. But the thing about being men is that we can adjust and will have value beyond just our physical attractiveness.

And it’s true women want the wallet for a husband or boyfriend. But in terms of putting out, money is meaningless to them, and they just want raw attraction.

But also as others have said, you shouldn’t care what women want. Really, it’s better to live without women. Nothing good ever comes from them.

Let me correct myself..neither worked in the long term. Loyalty is a concept lost on the modern female. Had plenty of one night stands, playing the aloof role (once i realized being a decent human being wasnt working). Ironically, this is what led me to mgtow. Now the thought of it disgusts me

[Anonymous]

eqlife wrote:

Bad boy, nice guy…doesn’t matter. I’ve played both roles. Neither worked. Why? Because I am poor. Money trumps all, hence the rise in young females looking for a “daddy” (look up ddlg/daddy on tumblr. Literally thousands of women BEGGING for money, selling their dirty panties or downright asking for some cuck to send them a money order. A lot of them are UNDERAGE. Trained from birth to be leeches). The fact is most women are grown children looking to be taken care of. Alpha/beta is a facade. We are all potential beta providers in their eyes. I noticed this trend grow exponentially after 50 Shades of Grey blew up. That book is actually interesting, not the book itself, but the way it put female nature on blast (by their own doing). They want to be dominated, only as long as they are taken care of and absolved of all responsibility

A lot of this is right, but not really the first part.

I was broke into my early-30s. I worked white collar and was unconnected, and it took a long time to make connections, get rid of debt, and build stability. My story is not uncommon.

But women were absolutely all over me most of that time. When it’s just sex, no relationship or anything else, they prefer attractive men. Yes it doesn’t matter good guy or bad guy, except to the fact that “Chad” is code for a type of effeminate bad guy.

Most men aren’t attractive. And if you’re not attractive, you have to play the Chad role or get money. That’s true.

If anything, I did sort of hit a “wall” in my late/20s early/30s when it was then money that began to matter more. Although younger women even then didn’t care so much, and as my sex drive began to collapse it was harder and harder for me to care. I began to really start getting in the positive around then but it could have been the last of my youthful looks as well before they faded. But the thing about being men is that we can adjust and will have value beyond just our physical attractiveness.

And it’s true women want the wallet for a husband or boyfriend. But in terms of putting out, money is meaningless to them, and they just want raw attraction.

But also as others have said, you shouldn’t care what women want. Really, it’s better to live without women. Nothing good ever comes from them.

[bobphiloParticipant]

eqlife wrote:

Bad boy, nice guy…doesn’t matter. I’ve played both roles. Neither worked. Why? Because I am poor. Money trumps all, hence the rise in young females looking for a “daddy” (look up ddlg/daddy on tumblr. Literally thousands of women BEGGING for money, selling their dirty panties or downright asking for some cuck to send them a money order. A lot of them are UNDERAGE. Trained from birth to be leeches). The fact is most women are grown children looking to be taken care of. Alpha/beta is a facade. We are all potential beta providers in their eyes. I noticed this trend grow exponentially after 50 Shades of Grey blew up. That book is actually interesting, not the book itself, but the way it put female nature on blast (by their own doing). They want to be dominated, only as long as they are taken care of and absolved of all responsibility

I basically agree with most of what you say but a lot of bad boys with no money still get a lot of chicks due to their thuggish nature. The great success of 50 Shades of Grey shows that women are doubly attracted to men that are both sadists and rich.
Women report that rape is their number one fantasy (followed by lesbian sex) in which they are ravished by a goon without respect to his financial standing.

[JollyMisanthropeParticipant]

eqlife wrote:

Bad boy, nice guy…doesn’t matter. I’ve played both roles. Neither worked. Why? Because I am poor. Money trumps all, hence the rise in young females looking for a “daddy” (look up ddlg/daddy on tumblr. Literally thousands of women BEGGING for money, selling their dirty panties or downright asking for some cuck to send them a money order. A lot of them are UNDERAGE. Trained from birth to be leeches). The fact is most women are grown children looking to be taken care of. Alpha/beta is a facade. We are all potential beta providers in their eyes. I noticed this trend grow exponentially after 50 Shades of Grey blew up. That book is actually interesting, not the book itself, but the way it put female nature on blast (by their own doing). They want to be dominated, only as long as they are taken care of and absolved of all responsibility

They expect you to alter your personality to fit their mood. At one moment they want you to be a bad boy and take charge, the next they want a sensitive nice guy to be their emotional tampon. You are basically an actor in their life story, playing whatever role they want you to play.

The Children of Doom... Doom's Children. They told my lord the way to the Mountain of Power. They told him to throw down his sword and return to the Earth... Ha! Time enough for the Earth in the grave.

[eqlifeSpectator]

Bad boy, nice guy…doesn’t matter. I’ve played both roles. Neither worked. Why? Because I am poor. Money trumps all, hence the rise in young females looking for a “daddy” (look up ddlg/daddy on tumblr. Literally thousands of women BEGGING for money, selling their dirty panties or downright asking for some cuck to send them a money order. A lot of them are UNDERAGE. Trained from birth to be leeches). The fact is most women are grown children looking to be taken care of. Alpha/beta is a facade. We are all potential beta providers in their eyes. I noticed this trend grow exponentially after 50 Shades of Grey blew up. That book is actually interesting, not the book itself, but the way it put female nature on blast (by their own doing). They want to be dominated, only as long as they are taken care of and absolved of all responsibility

[CatsPawParticipant]

Its really hard to tell between propaganda, lies and deception to get to the truth.
Remember Obama? What he was “supposed” to do?

Then we got Trump, Hillary, and in a way, before the elections Hillary is almost getting eliminated before the elections.
It does look very suspicious if you ask me.
Very convenient that right after the FBI drops the Investigation, the health problems show up.
As far as I am concerned, its either Ron Paul, or probably more crap.

[HitmanParticipant]

fail.
Trump is a 70 year old man.
so what if he has a few pounds on him ?
at least he’s not having seizures in front of the press.
.
this is a ridiculous attempt ,
it means they’re getting desperate …

The democrats new plan of attack against Trump: Fat Shaming.

You can read about it here.

Wow! Harry Reid and Democrats Hope to Pick Up Votes By ‘Fat Shaming’ Donald Trump (VIDEO)

The video is here:

The democrats have spent way too much time around women. Because “fat shaming” does not work on men. And this could badly backfire on the democrats.

Besides, this being extremely hypocritical. Trump is not wearing a full winter coat to hide his body, while his political opponent is. And the democrats did not realize what they have done.

The democrats have opened the door for the Alt Right to start doing, “Your momma is so fat”, joke memes against Hillary.